Article Sidebar

Download
Requires Subscription PDF (فارسی)
Statistic
Read Counter : 4 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Urban recreational parks play a significant role in enhancing the quality of life and fostering social inclusion. Nevertheless, persons with disabilities encounter serious limitations in utilizing these public spaces. The objective of this research is to evaluate the accessibility of parks within the third district of Kabul City for persons with disabilities and to identify the prevailing obstacles. This study employed a descriptive-analytical methodology with a mixed-methods approach. Data was gathered via systematic field observations, using a checklist based on the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, and through interviews with 29 participants. The quantitative findings show that the average accessibility score of the parks is merely 54%. Kabul Zoo had the highest rate of compliance at 63.3%, while Chamchamast Park had the lowest at 45.6%. Primary challenges comprise improper entrances, non-compliant ramps, a lack of dedicated accessible restrooms, and socio-psychological barriers. These findings underscore the necessity of infrastructure reform and attention to universal design principles. In this regard, a pilot design for the implementation of these standards in "Nawruz Park" is presented as a template.

Keywords

Spatial Justice Disability Parks ADA Accessibility Standards Inclusive Design

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 نویسنده

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Stanikzai, A. K., Halimee, M. K., & Rustami, S. (2026). Accessibility Assessment of Recreational Parks for People with Disabilities: A Case Study of District 3, Kabul City. Journal of Natural Sciences – Kabul University, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.62810/jns.v9i1.523
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. رفیع زاده، ن. (۱۴۰۰). تحلیل میزان دسترسی پذیری بوستان های شهر تهران برای افراد داری محدودیت جسمی-حرکتی با تأکید بر مفهوم دیزاین فراگیر. نشریه علمی باغ نظر, ۳۵-۴۶. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.230179.4539
  2. احمد زاده،ح.؛ مکانی بناب، س. و غفاری، ی. (۱۳۹۳). ارزیابی و بررسی وضعیت پارک های شهر تبریز بر اساس استندرد های مناسب سازی ویژه افراد دارای معلولیت(نمونه موردی پارک های منطقه ۲ شهرداری تبریز. هشتمین کنگره ملی مهندسی عمران، پوهنځی مهندسی عمران، بابل. بازیابی شده از لینک.
  3. تقوایی، م.، مرادی، گ.، & صفرآبادی، ا. (۱۳۸۹). بررسی وارزیابی وضعیت پارک های شهر اصفهان به اساس معیارها وظوابط موجود برای دسترسی معلولان وجانبازان. مجله جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی محیطی، ۴۷-۶۴. بازیابی شده از لینک
  4. ریاست عمومی برنامه ریزی شهری، وزارت شهرسازی و مسکن. (۲۰۱۹). طرزالعمل تهیه پلان های تفصیلی شهری.
  5. کرکه آبادی، ز.، و میرزایی، ع. (۱۴۰۰). بررسی فضاهای پارک های شهری براساس توانمندی‌های معلولین جسمی حرکتی (نمونه موردی: پارک نبوت کرج). فصلنامه آینده پژوهی شهری، ۲۱-۳۷. doi:10.30495/uf.2021.1935545.1008
  6. نیکزاد، خ. (۱۴۰۰). افراد دارای معلولیت حدود۱۴درصد کُل جمعیت کشور را تشکیل می‌دهند | طلوع‌نیوز. لینک
  7. شاروالی کابل. (۱۴۰۵). شاروالی کابل. لینک
  8. Department of Justice. (2010). 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design.
  9. Güngör, S., & ARISOY, N. (2023). A Research on The Accessibility of Parks: The Case of Ankara Ahmed Arif Park. Proceeding Book of 4th International Conference on Engineering and Applied Natural Sciences ICEANS 2023. 4th International Conference on Engineering and Applied Natural Sciences ICEANS 2023. https://doi.org/10.59287/as-proceedings.280
  10. Güngör, S., Demir, M., & Polat, A. T. (2016). A ReseARch on Accessıbılıty of uRbAn pARks by dısAbled useRs. 6(12). Link
  11. Hadeel R Bakhsh, Chippendale, T., Al-Haizan, N., & Bin Sheeha, B. H. (2024). Assessment of park paths and trails to promote physical accessibility among wheelchair users in Saudi Arabia. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861241254511
  12. Inauguration of Seven Public Parks in Kabul. Investing in Public Spaces. | UN-Habitat. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2026. Link
  13. Lepoglavec, K., Papes, O., Lovric, V., Raspudić, A., & Nevecerel, H. (2023). Accessibility of Urban Forests and Parks for People with Disabilities in Wheelchairs Considering the Surface and Longitudinal Slope of the Trails. Sustainability, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107741
  14. Mushkani, R. A., & Ono, H. (2021). The role of land use and vitality in fostering gender equality in urban public parks: The case of Kabul city, Afghanistan. Habitat International, 118, 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102462
  15. The Asia Foundation. (2020). Model Disability Survey of Afghanistan 2019. Link
  16. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2006). Article 9—Accessibility (Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities). Link
  17. WHO. (2022). Global Report on Health Equity for Persons with Disabilities (1st ed). World Health Organization.
  18. Wojnowska-Heciak, M., Suchocka, M., Błaszczyk, M., & Muszyńska, M. (2022). Urban Parks as Perceived by City Residents with Mobility Difficulties: A Qualitative Study with In-Depth Interviews. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042018
  19. World Bank. (2023). Disability Inclusion Overview. Link