Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (فارسی)
Statistic
Read Counter : 195 Download : 91

Main Article Content

Abstract

Public parks serve as essential urban assets, fostering social connectivity and improving overall quality of life. However, individuals with disabilities continue to face significant hurdles in accessing these spaces due to persistent physical and social barriers. This research evaluates the accessibility of parks in District 3 of Kabul and identifies the specific obstacles encountered by disabled citizens. Adopting a descriptive-analytical framework, the study employs a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data was gathered through systematic field observations based on Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards, while qualitative insights were derived from interviews with 29 participants. The analysis reveals an average accessibility score of 54% across the surveyed parks; Kabul Zoo demonstrated the highest compliance (63.3%), whereas Chamchama Park recorded the lowest (45.6%). Critical deficiencies identified include poorly designed entrances, substandard ramps, the absence of accessible restrooms, and prevailing socio-psychological barriers. Ultimately, these findings underscore a pressing need for infrastructural upgrades and the integration of universal design principles in urban planning.

Keywords

Spatial Justice Disability Parks ADA Accessibility Standards Inclusive Design

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 نویسنده

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Stanikzai, A. K., Halimee, M. K., & Rustami, S. (2026). Accessibility Assessment of Recreational Parks for People with Disabilities: A Case Study of District 3, Kabul City. Journal of Natural Sciences – Kabul University, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.62810/jns.v9i1.523
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. رفیع زاده، ن. (۱۴۰۰). تحلیل میزان دسترسی پذیری بوستان های شهر تهران برای افراد داری محدودیت جسمی-حرکتی با تأکید بر مفهوم دیزاین فراگیر. نشریه علمی باغ نظر, ۳۵-۴۶. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.230179.4539
  2. احمد زاده،ح.؛ مکانی بناب، س. و غفاری، ی. (۱۳۹۳). ارزیابی و بررسی وضعیت پارک های شهر تبریز بر اساس استندرد های مناسب سازی ویژه افراد دارای معلولیت(نمونه موردی پارک های منطقه ۲ شهرداری تبریز. هشتمین کنگره ملی مهندسی عمران، پوهنځی مهندسی عمران، بابل. بازیابی شده از لینک.
  3. تقوایی، م.، مرادی، گ.، & صفرآبادی، ا. (۱۳۸۹). بررسی وارزیابی وضعیت پارک های شهر اصفهان به اساس معیارها وظوابط موجود برای دسترسی معلولان وجانبازان. مجله جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی محیطی، ۴۷-۶۴. بازیابی شده از لینک
  4. ریاست عمومی برنامه ریزی شهری، وزارت شهرسازی و مسکن. (۲۰۱۹). طرزالعمل تهیه پلان های تفصیلی شهری.
  5. کرکه آبادی، ز.، و میرزایی، ع. (۱۴۰۰). بررسی فضاهای پارک های شهری براساس توانمندی‌های معلولین جسمی حرکتی (نمونه موردی: پارک نبوت کرج). فصلنامه آینده پژوهی شهری، ۲۱-۳۷. doi:10.30495/uf.2021.1935545.1008
  6. نیکزاد، خ. (۱۴۰۰). افراد دارای معلولیت حدود۱۴درصد کُل جمعیت کشور را تشکیل می‌دهند | طلوع‌نیوز. لینک
  7. شاروالی کابل. (۱۴۰۵). شاروالی کابل. لینک
  8. Department of Justice. (2010). 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design.
  9. Güngör, S., & ARISOY, N. (2023). A Research on The Accessibility of Parks: The Case of Ankara Ahmed Arif Park. Proceeding Book of 4th International Conference on Engineering and Applied Natural Sciences ICEANS 2023. 4th International Conference on Engineering and Applied Natural Sciences ICEANS 2023. https://doi.org/10.59287/as-proceedings.280
  10. Güngör, S., Demir, M., & Polat, A. T. (2016). A ReseARch on Accessıbılıty of uRbAn pARks by dısAbled useRs. 6(12). Link
  11. Hadeel R Bakhsh, Chippendale, T., Al-Haizan, N., & Bin Sheeha, B. H. (2024). Assessment of park paths and trails to promote physical accessibility among wheelchair users in Saudi Arabia. Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861241254511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861241254511
  12. Inauguration of Seven Public Parks in Kabul. Investing in Public Spaces. | UN-Habitat. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2026. Link
  13. Lepoglavec, K., Papes, O., Lovric, V., Raspudić, A., & Nevecerel, H. (2023). Accessibility of Urban Forests and Parks for People with Disabilities in Wheelchairs Considering the Surface and Longitudinal Slope of the Trails. Sustainability, 1-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107741 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107741
  14. Mushkani, R. A., & Ono, H. (2021). The role of land use and vitality in fostering gender equality in urban public parks: The case of Kabul city, Afghanistan. Habitat International, 118, 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102462
  15. The Asia Foundation. (2020). Model Disability Survey of Afghanistan 2019. Link
  16. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2006). Article 9—Accessibility (Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities). Link
  17. WHO. (2022). Global Report on Health Equity for Persons with Disabilities (1st ed). World Health Organization.
  18. Wojnowska-Heciak, M., Suchocka, M., Błaszczyk, M., & Muszyńska, M. (2022). Urban Parks as Perceived by City Residents with Mobility Difficulties: A Qualitative Study with In-Depth Interviews. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042018
  19. World Bank. (2023). Disability Inclusion Overview. Link