Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper examines the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance (QA) model in Afghanistan by studying current academic and policy documents on QA in education. In this exploratory qualitative & quantitative research, the descriptive methodology is applied, and data is collected through the survey. The selected population is the department heads and quality assurance sub-committees of Kabul University. The questionnaire reliability tested 0.9 on the SPSS. It included three items: The initial findings show that the QA concept since 2011 was partially developed, and e the process in the state and private universities being monitored and evaluated by the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Directorate (QAAD) at the Ministry of Higher Education of Afghanistan. The outcome of the service provided by QAAD resulted in the accreditation of 88 states and private universities accreditation in three stages so far. The result of the study indicates that most respondents questioned the effectiveness of the QA program, as it failed to ensure the quality desired by the beneficiaries.

Keywords

Accreditation Effectiveness Framework Kabul University Quality Assurance

Article Details

How to Cite
Auzarmi, Z. K. R. . (2025). The Study of Effectiveness of Quality Assurance Framework in Higher Education System of Afghanistan from Kabul University Instructors’ Perspective. Journal of Natural Sciences – Kabul University, 6(2), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.62810/jns.v6i2.382

References

  1. Agamy, E. (2007). The Impact of Quality Assurance on Enhancing . Institutional Research Unit, University of Sharjah, UAE.
  2. Agamy, E. (2015). How to Manage Quality Assurance in a Comprehensive University with a Wide Variety of Programs and Different Instruction Systems . University of Sharjah, UAE, 1-14.
  3. BILLING, D. (2003). Higher Education Quality Assurance Organisations in Central and Eastern Europe. ResearchGate, 243-258.
  4. Manghani, K. (2011). Quality assurance: Importance of. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 34-37; DOI:10.4103/2229-3485.76288Corpus ID: 5201640.
  5. Manghani, K. (2011). Quality assurance: Importance of systems and standard operating . Perspectives in Clinical Research.
  6. OFA, C. J. (2016). Instructional supervision and quality assurance in schools in Nigeria. ResearchGate, DOI: 10.21859/eulawrev-08013.
  7. P. Eya, a. L. (2012). EFFECTIVE SUPERVISION OF INSTRUCTION IN NIGERIAN SECONDARY SCHOOLS: ISSUES IN QUALITY ASSURANCE. Journal of Qualitative Education, 1-6; Corpus ID: 55603011.
  8. QAAD. (2023, 01 Thursday). QAAD. Retrieved from qaad.edu.af: https://qaad.edu.af/en/
  9. Vidovich, L. (2001). A Conceptual Framework for Analysis of Education Policy and Practices. The University of Western Australia, 22.
  10. Wonah, A. F. (2020). Quality assurance practices and effectiveness of public universities in cross river state,Nigeria. Research Gate .
  11. Ziarati, N. G. (2002). Developing a Quality Criteria for Applications in the Higher Education Sector in Turkey. ResearchGate, 20-38 DOI: 10.1080/0954412022000017021.