Article Sidebar

Download
PDF (فارسی)
Statistic
Read Counter : 15 Download : 6

Main Article Content

Abstract

As compliance with laws, regulations, values, and expected behaviors is necessary for every part of life, in the process of research work, a set of values, principles, and rules should be followed, which are offered under the title of research ethics. The principles of research ethics include honesty and trustworthiness, realism and impartiality, respect for individuals and persons included in the research, usefulness and non-abuse, keeping confidential the secrets of individuals and available information, non-discrimination and taking into account national interests, criticism, respect for intellectual property and Correct citation, justice and the rules of using animals in research are mandatory for all researchers, university staff and students to know and consider. Observing these ethical standards in research increases the trust and credibility of researchers and analysis, increases the effectiveness of research, the well-being of people and the country, promotes social ethics and mutual respect, creates relationships and cooperation between researchers and the public, and ultimately increases the quality of higher education.

Keywords

Ethics Research Ethics Principles of Research Ethics Benefits of Research Ethics Higher Education Researcher

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Reserved for Kabul University

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Farkhary, S. I. (2025). Research Ethics and Its Importance in Improving Higher Education. Journal of Natural Sciences – Kabul University, 6(2), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.62810/jns.v6i2.380
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. القرآن الکریم: سوره آل عمران، 133- 134، سوره فصلت: 34، سوره قلم: 4.
  2. تابعی، ض.، و محمودیان، ف. (1386). "اخلاق در پژوهشگری". اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، شماره 2: 49–56.
  3. زاهدپاشا، ی.، حسنجانی، ر.، و ریاحی، ح. ر. (1382). "میزان رعایت اخلاق پزشکی در پایان‌ نامه‌ها و کارآزمایی‌های بالینی در دانشگاه علوم پزشکی بابل". مجله علمی پزشکی بابل، شماره 3، دوره 5: 45–51.
  4. سایت نوار اسلام. (1394). "اخلاق اسلامی". کتابخانه عقیده www.aqeedeh.com.
  5. سباعی، م. (1394). "اخلاق اجتماعی برای همه". ترجمه‌ی عبدالعزیز سلیمی، کتابخانه عقیده www.aqeedeh.com.
  6. شروانی، ا. (1386). "رعایت اخلاق در نگارش مقالات علمی". مجله روان‌پزشکی و روانشناسی بالینی ایران، شماره 13، دوره 2: 87–88.
  7. منجیری، ه. (1394). "رابطه بین جو اخلاقی سازمان و رفتار اخلاقی مدیران". مدیریت دولتی. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی.
  8. Abbasi, R., Taheri, G., & Babashahi, J. (2018). Investigating Faculty Member's Professional Ethics in View of Students. Ethics in Science & Technology. 12
  9. Ahearne, J. F. (2011). Honesty. American Scientist, 2: 120-123.
  10. Baez, B. (2002). Confidentiality in qualitative research: Reflections on secrets, power and agency. Qualitative research, 1: 35-58.
  11. Baumans, V. (2004). Use of animals in experimental research: an ethical dilemma?. Gene therapy, 1: S64-S66.
  12. Bishop, L. J., & Nolen, A. L. (2001). Animals in research and education: Ethical issues. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1: 91-112.
  13. Bos, B., Broekhuizen, T. L., & de Faria, P. (2015). A dynamic view on secrecy management. Journal of Business Research, 12: 2619-2627.
  14. Carroll, N. (2000). Art and ethical criticism: An overview of recent directions of research. Ethics, 2: 350-387.
  15. Crow, G., Wiles, R., Heath, S., & Charles, V. (2006). Research ethics and data quality: The implications of informed consent. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2: 83-95.
  16. Demuijnck, G. (2009). Non-discrimination in human resources management as a moral obligation. Journal of Business Ethics, 1: 83-101.
  17. Edwards, S. J., Ashcroft, R., & Kirchin, S. (2004). Research ethics committees: differences and moral judgement. Bioethics, 5: 408-427.
  18. Greaney, A. M., Sheehy, A., Heffernan, C., Murphy, J., Mhaolrúnaigh, S. N., Heffernan, E., & Brown, G. (2012). Research ethics application: A guide for the novice researcher. British Journal of Nursing, 1: 38-43.
  19. Henry, E. (2009). Strategic disclosure of research results: The cost of proving your honesty. The Economic Journal, 1036-1064.
  20. Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Sage.
  21. Kamat, P. V. (2006). Research ethics. In Symp Sci Publ ACS Natl Meet, 49.
  22. Lawrence, J. A., Kaplan, I., & McFarlane, C. (2013). The role of respect in research interactions with refugee children and young people. Values and vulnerabilities: The ethics of research with refugees and asylum seekers, 103-126.
  23. McAreavey, R., & Muir, J. (2011). Research ethics committees: Values and power in higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 5: 391-405.
  24. Mundava, M., & Chaudhuri, J. (2007). Understanding plagiarism: The role of librarians at the University of Tennessee in assisting students to practice fair use of information. College & Research Libraries News, 3: 170-173.
  25. Navalta, J. W., Stone, W. J., & Lyons, S. (2019). Ethical issues relating to scientific discovery in exercise science. International journal of exercise science, 1: 1.
  26. Oliver, P. (2010). The student's guide to research ethics. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  27. Parsell, M., Ambler, T., & Jacenyik-Trawoger, C. (2014). Ethics in higher education research. Studies in Higher Education, 1: 166-179.
  28. Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics. Science and engineering ethics, 8: 191-205.
  29. Rahimi, H., & Agha Babayi, R. (2013). Relationship between organizational culture and professional ethic faculty members of Kashan University. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 2: 61-67.
  30. Scott, P. (2004). Ethics ‘in’and ‘for’higher education. Higher Education in Europe, 4: 439-450.
  31. Steinke, E. E. (2004). Research ethics, informed consent, and participant recruitment. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 2: 88-97.
  32. Walton, M., & Hassreiter, S. (2015). Real friends and fake friends: Research relationships in an era of global social media. In Ethical Quandaries in Social Research.. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council.
  33. Zhong, C. B. (2011). The ethical dangers of deliberative decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1: 1-25.