Main Article Content

Abstract

Research is pivotal in a nation's scientific, economic, social, and historical advancement, serving as the cornerstone of higher education. However, research in Afghanistan's higher education sector remains underdeveloped. This study seeks to underscore the paramount importance of research and explore avenues for its enhancement within Afghanistan's higher education landscape. The research methodology involves interviews with 15 faculty members from Nangarhar University and collecting responses to online questionnaires from 163 educators across various universities. The combined quantitative and qualitative findings accentuate the potential of research as a catalyst for improvement and problem-solving. Moreover, the study categorizes strengthening methods into five distinct types: capacity building, quality enhancement, creating opportunities, fostering motivation, and effectively implementing research outcomes.

Keywords

Higher Education Research ; Importance of Research Increasing Capacity Quality Improvement Possibilities Motivation

Article Details

How to Cite
Haqyar, H. K. ., & Hamid, I. (2025). The Importance and Strengthening Methods of Research in Afghanistan’s Higher Education. Journal of Natural Sciences – Kabul University, 6(2), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.62810/jns.v6i2.377

References

  1. حضرتی، عباس. (۱۳۹۵). واکاوی موانع و راهکارهای توسعه فرهنگ پژوهش در آموزش و پرورش ایران. کنفرانس بین المللی نوآوری و تحقیق در علوم انسانی مدیریت و معارف اسلامی، قم. مرکز مطالعات و تحقیقات اسلامی سروش حکمت مرتضوی - انجمن علمی ارتباطات و تبلیغ حوزه علمیه.
  2. قمشاهی، مژگان. اخوت، محمدعلی. (۱۳۹۵). شناسایی موانع و مشکلات انجام پژوهش در آموزش و پرورش و ارائه راهکار نخستین همایش ملی تازه های تعلیم و تربیت در نظام آموزشی ایران. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اردکان.
  3. Azimi, M. N., & Balakarzai, A. T. (2020). Nation Building through Higher Education System Resurgence in Afghanistan. Handbook of Education Systems in South Asia, 1-22.
  4. Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019). Citations, citation indicators, and research quality: An overview of basic concepts and theories. Sage Open, 9(1), 2158244019829575.
  5. Barrett, A. M., Crossley, M., & Dachi, H. A. (2011). International collaboration and research capacity building: Learning from the EdQual experience. Comparative Education, 47(1), 25-43.
  6. Chikwe, C. K., Ogidi, R. C., & Nwachukwu, K. (2015). Challenges of Research and Human Capital Development in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(28), 44-47.
  7. Davis, D., Davis, M. E., Jadad, A., Perrier, L., Rath, D., Ryan, D., ... & Zwarenstein, M. (2003). The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effect. Bmj, 327(7405), 33-35.
  8. Draheim, C., Mashburn, C. A., Martin, J. D., & Engle, R. W. (2019). Reaction time in differential and developmental research: A review and commentary on the problems and alternatives. Psychological Bulletin, 145(5), 508.
  9. Göransson, B., & Brundenius, C. (Eds.). (2010). Universities in transition: The changing role and challenges for academic institutions. Springer Science & Business Media.
  10. Hammad, W., & Al-Ani, W. (2021). Building educational research capacity: challenges and opportunities from the perspectives of faculty members at a national university in Oman. SAGE Open, 11(3), 21582440211032668.
  11. Huenneke, L. F., Stearns, D. M., Martinez, J. D., & Laurila, K. (2017). Key strategies for building research capacity of university faculty members. Innovative higher education, 42(5), 421-435.
  12. Kazoka, J. E., & Wema, E. F. (2020). An analysis of the factors influencing research capacity developments in higher education institutions in Tanzania. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, 15(1), 45-66.
  13. Hill, J. K. (2006). University research and local economic development (pp. 7-36). Center for Competitiveness and Prosperity Research, L. William Seidman Research Institute, WP Carey School of Business, Arizona State University.
  14. Leitch, R. (2009). Harnessing the slipstream: Building educational research capacity in Northern Ireland. Size matters. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(4), 355–371.
  15. Lohr, K. N. (2004). Rating the strength of scientific evidence: Relevance for quality improvement programs. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16(1), 9–18.
  16. Munn, P. (2008). Building research capacity collaboratively: Can we take ownership of our future? British Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 413–430.
  17. Naoreen, B., & Adeeb, M. A. (2014).Investigating Academic Research Culture in Public Sector Universities of Pakistan. Social & Behavioral Sciences, 116(21), 3010-3015.
  18. Persson, J. (2018). Talking collaboration: Conceptualizing collaborative research for sustainable development in theory and practice.
  19. Rees, G., Baronb, S., Boyaskc, R., & Taylora, C. (2007). Research capacity building, professional learning and the social practices of educational research. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), 761–779.
  20. Sakran, M. (2010, April 20–April 21). Educational research from a critical perspective [Paper presentation]. 10th Scientific
  21. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students. Pearson education.
  22. Sellami, A., Arar, K., & Sawalhi, R. (2022). Higher Education and Scientific Research in the Arabian Gulf States: Opportunities, Aspirations, and Challenges. Taylor & Francis.
  23. Shavelson, R. J., & Towne, L. (Eds.). (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press.
  24. Zhang, X. (2014). Factors that motivate academic staff to conduct research and influence research productivity in Chinese project 211 universities (Doctoral dissertation, University of Canberra).