د مقالې جانبي پينل

راښکته کول
PDF (English)
احصایې
د لوستلو شمېر : 91 راښکته کول : 54

د مقالې اصلي محتوا

خلاصه

در این مقاله رویه­های مختلف گوسفند مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته که عبارت اند از رویه­ی نسلگیری فصلی، شهوت، رویه­ی معاشقه و آمیزش، رویه­ی میش پیش از زایمان، رویه­ی میش در وقت زایمان، رویه­ی میش بعد از زایمان، رویه­ی بره نوزاد بعد از تولد، رویه­ی خوراکی و رویه­ی گوسفند در حالت بیماری و صحت می­باشد. گوسفند یک حیوان بی­دفاع بوده و یگانه راه دفاع آن­ها از شکارچی­ها فرار می­باشد. گوسفندان علاقمند به زنده­گی گله­ی بوده و روابط بین یگدیگر را به خوبی حفظ می­نمایند. تمایل گوسفندان به پیروی از یک رهبر به خوبی دیده شده طوری­که در جریان حرکت و چرش گوسفندان از گوسفندی که در جلوی گله قرار دارد به خوبی پیروی می­نماید. دانستن رویه­های مختلف گوسفند برای یک گوسفند­دار بسیار مهم می­باشد. زیرا در صورت دانستن رویه­های گوسفند نه به گوسفند و نه به گوسفند­دار صدمه می­رسد. 

کلیدي ټکي

رویه¬ اجتماعی گوسفند نشخوارکننده¬گان کوچک حیوانات

د مقالې جزئیات

جواز

د کاپی رایت بیان

د کرییټیو کامنز BY-NC 4.0 نړیوال لایسنس
څنګه استناد وکړو
حبیبی ا. (2025). مطالعه‌ی رویه‌های اجتماعی در گوسفند. د کابل پوهنتون د طبیعي علومو علمي ــ څېړنیزه مجله , 5(3), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.62810/jns.v5i3.288
د ارجاع داونلوډ
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

ماخذونه

  1. Carolina Flota-Banuelos., Juan A., Rivera - Lorca. and Bemardino Candelaria - Martinez. Importance of sheep social hierarchy on feeding behavior and parasite load in Silvo pastoral and grass monoculture grazing systems. 2019; 10. Pp. 52, 58-62.
  2. Shinde A.K., Verma D.L. and Singh N.P. Social dominance subordinate relationships on a flock of Marwari goats. Indian Journal of Animal Science. 2004; 74. Pp. 215-218.
  3. Resko J.A., Perkins A., Roselli C.E. and Stormshak, F.K. Sexual behavior of rams: male orientation and its endocrine correlates. Reproduction in Domestic Animals IV. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Reproduction in Domestic Ruminants, Colorado Springs, USA. 1999; Pp. 259-269.
  4. Vazquez R., Orihuela A. and Aguirre V. Effect of dominance-subordinate relationship and familiarity of an audience male on young rams libido and semen characteristics. J Vet Behav. 2012; 7(2). Pp. 80-82.
  5. Victor R Squires. Ecology and behavior of domestic sheep (Orvis Aries): a review. Mammal Review. 2008; Pp. 37, 43, 44, 47, 50.
  6. Asim Faraz. and Abdul Waheed. Sheep and Goat Production. SCAP Publishers Faisalabad. 2018; Pp. 1, 3-5.
  7. Romano, J.E., Fernandez Abella D. and Villegas, S.S. A note on the effect of continuous presence of estrus onset, duration and ovulation time in estrus synchronized ewes. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2001; 73(3). Pp. 193-198.
  8. Miranda-De La Lama G.C., Pascual-Alonso M., Guerrero A., Alberti P., Aliert S., Sans P., Gajan J.P., Villaroel M., Dalmau A., Velarde A. and Campo M.M. Influence of social dominance on production, welfare and the quality of meat from beef bulls. Meat Science. 2015; Pp. 435-436.
  9. Jolly S. & Wallace, A. Best Practice for Production Feeding of Lambs: a Review of the Literature. Meat Livestock Australia. 2007; 12. Pp. 4-5.
  10. Porter R.H., Bon R. and Orgeur P. The role of familiarity in the development of social recognition in lambs. Behavior. 2001; 138(2). Pp. 207-219.
  11. Rice M., Jongman E.C., Butler K.L. and Hemsworth P.H. Relationships between temperament, feeding behavior, social interactions, and stress in lambs adapting to a feedlot environment. Applied Animal Behavior Science. 2016; 183. Pp. 42-50.
  12. Sevi A., Muscio A., Dantone D., Iascone V. and D’Emilio, F. Paddock shape effects on grazing behavior and efficiency in sheep. Journal of Range Management. 2001; 54(2). Pp. 122-125.
  13. Jose Coriolano., Vinicius de Franca., Edgard Cavalcanti., Edilson Paes. and Ariosvaldo Nunes. Available space in feeders for housed sheep: social behavior and performance. Brazilian Journal of Animal Science. 2018; Pp. 4-5.
  14. Buskirk D., Zanella A., Harrigari T., Van Lente J., Gnagey L. and Kaercher M. Large round bale design affects hay utilization and beef cow behavior. Journal of Animal Science. 2003; 81. Pp. 108-112.
  15. Stevens C., McFarland I. and Ashton B. Feeding and managing sheep in dry times. Department of Agriculture and Australian Wool Innovation, Western Australia. 2005; Pp. 3, 7.
  16. Stafford K.J. and Gregory N.G. Implication of intensification of pastoral animal production on animal welfare. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 2008; 56. Pp. 270-274.
  17. Mariska Liebenberg. The effect of environmental enrichment on behavior, production parameters and meat quality of finishing lambs in a feedlot. Faculty of Agri Sciences at Stellenbosch University. 2017; Pp. 7, 10, 28, 48.
  18. Averos X., Beltran de Heredia., I Ruiz R. and Estevez I. The impact of group size on welfare indicators of ewes during pregnancy. Doi. Org. 2016; Pp. 3, 5.
  19. ) Simoes J., Abecia J.A., Cannas A., Delagadillo J.A., Lacasta D. Voigt K. and Chemineau P. Review: Managing sheep and goats for sustainable high yield production. The international Journal of animal biosciences. 2021; Pp. 7-8.
  20. Benavides J., Gonzalez L, Dagleish M. and Perez V. Diagnostic Pathology in microbial disease of sheep and goats. Veterinary Microbiology. 2015; pp. 181, 15-26.
  21. Astiz S. Matermal Metabolic demands caused by pregnancy and lactation: association with productivity and offspring phenotype in high-yielding dairy ewes. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9. Pp. 295.
  22. Ridler A., Disease threats to sheep associated with intensification of pastoral farming. New Zealand Veterinary Journal. 2008; 56. Pp. 270-273.
  23. Hogerwerf L., Vanden Brom R., Roest H.I.J., Bouma A., Vellema P., Pieterse M., Dercksen D. and Nielen M. Reduction of Coxiella burnetii prevalence by vaccination of goat and sheep, the Netherlands. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2008; 17. Pp. 378-382.
  24. Jay M. and Tardy F. Contagious agalactiain sheep and goats: current perspective. Veterinary Medicine: Research and Reports. 2019; 10. Pp. 230-232.
  25. Ewenetau Mulugata Ayalew. Sheep and Goat Production Text Book. LAP Lambert Academic publishing. 2016; Pp. 23, 27-28, 35.