Main Article Content
Abstract
The advent of advanced technology has revolutionized communication and information exchange, allowing people to access the latest developments in any field instantly. Among its many applications, technology's impact on scientific and educational environments is particularly significant. It complements traditional education by addressing academic challenges such as design, implementation, and evaluation, ultimately achieving high-quality scientific goals. Chemistry, like other sciences, has greatly benefited from technological advancements. This study explores the role and application of technology in teaching and learning chemistry. It highlights the benefits of using information technology in educational practices and introduces several systems, such as ISIS/Draw, Chem Tool Box, and Chem Office, demonstrating their utility in chemistry education.
Keywords
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2024 Reserved for Kabul University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
- Dhingra, K. Thinking about television science: How students understand the nature of science from different program genres. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2003; 40, 234–256.
- Friedler, Y., Nachmias, R., & Linn, M. C. Learning scientific reasoning skills in microcomputer-based laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1990; 27, 173–192.
- Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V. A critical discussion of the efficacy of using visual learning aids from the Internet to promote understanding, illustrated with examples explaining the Daniell voltaic cell. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5, 2009; 145–152.
- Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V.Using multimedia learning aids from the Internet for teaching chemistry. In S. Rodrigues (ed.), multiple literacy and science education: Technologys in formal and informal learning environments, 2010; (pp. 49–69).
- Fehring, H. Multiple literacies in the Technology age: Implications for teachers and teacher educators, an Australian perspective. In S. Rodrigues (ed.), multiple literacy and science education: Technologys in formal and informal learning environments 2010; (pp. 180–206)
- Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. Enhancing students’ understanding of the concept of chemical bonding by using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of the Research in Science Teaching, 2009; 46, 289–310
- Gabel, D. L., Briner, D., & Haines, D. Modeling with magnets – a unified approach to chemistry problem solving. The Science Teacher, 1992; 41, 58–63.
- Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & winter bottom, M. Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 2007; 32, 283–301.
- Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 2007; 32, 213–225.
- Hoffm n, J. L., Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E.The nature of middle schools learners’ science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2003; 40, 323–346.
- Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N.The laboratory in science education: foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88, 2004; 28–54.
- Huk, T. Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 2007; 392–404.
References
Dhingra, K. Thinking about television science: How students understand the nature of science from different program genres. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2003; 40, 234–256.
Friedler, Y., Nachmias, R., & Linn, M. C. Learning scientific reasoning skills in microcomputer-based laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1990; 27, 173–192.
Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V. A critical discussion of the efficacy of using visual learning aids from the Internet to promote understanding, illustrated with examples explaining the Daniell voltaic cell. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5, 2009; 145–152.
Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V.Using multimedia learning aids from the Internet for teaching chemistry. In S. Rodrigues (ed.), multiple literacy and science education: Technologys in formal and informal learning environments, 2010; (pp. 49–69).
Fehring, H. Multiple literacies in the Technology age: Implications for teachers and teacher educators, an Australian perspective. In S. Rodrigues (ed.), multiple literacy and science education: Technologys in formal and informal learning environments 2010; (pp. 180–206)
Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. Enhancing students’ understanding of the concept of chemical bonding by using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of the Research in Science Teaching, 2009; 46, 289–310
Gabel, D. L., Briner, D., & Haines, D. Modeling with magnets – a unified approach to chemistry problem solving. The Science Teacher, 1992; 41, 58–63.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & winter bottom, M. Pedagogical strategies for using the interactive whiteboard to foster learner participation in school science. Learning, Media and Technology, 2007; 32, 283–301.
Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 2007; 32, 213–225.
Hoffm n, J. L., Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E.The nature of middle schools learners’ science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2003; 40, 323–346.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N.The laboratory in science education: foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88, 2004; 28–54.
Huk, T. Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 2007; 392–404.